Comments on: The Rise Of The Artilects? (part1) http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/ the arbiter of bad taste. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:44:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Jack http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18830 Jack Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:54:54 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18830 @Hector: Couldn't disagree more. Artilects will be created, and it will be far from a doomsday event. Humans as a species are evolutionary stagnant and we will continue to strive to learn and evolve further. To Say the Singularity event can be stopped is short sited and completely wrong. Without the determination to get to that point whether consciously or otherwise is what brought about the computer you have in front of you now. @Hector: Couldn’t disagree more. Artilects will be created, and it will be far from a doomsday event. Humans as a species are evolutionary stagnant and we will continue to strive to learn and evolve further.

To Say the Singularity event can be stopped is short sited and completely wrong. Without the determination to get to that point whether consciously or otherwise is what brought about the computer you have in front of you now.

]]> By: Hector http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18828 Hector Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:37:13 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18828 why??? is this all realy necesary. the cosmists are merely brain washed puppets of there own higher power. The government wants better and stronger weapons this isnt a race for the bettering of humanity but a arms race. Only this time its more then just a war amongst a group of countries this is a matter that will concern the world. Leave it be, its to much we are already the most intelagent beings on the planet why jepordize that out of blind stupidity. I know my opinion wont change the future but it can help recruit. the creation of the artilects is inebidible but it can be stoped!!! The end of cosmists is my goal and i can only hope it is yours too, to leave things be. As they are is as they should stay. we live we die this is not the only life we will live i can promise you that. And im not trying to feed you any religous Bull Shit!!! you can feel it in your soul there are different dimensions of this universe and entitys roaming the earth as proof. Beleive what you will but in the end will come your answer.TO THE END OF COSMIST AND TO STOP THE GOAL TO CREATE A HIGHER BEING IS MY WILL!!! why??? is this all realy necesary. the cosmists are merely brain washed puppets of there own higher power. The government wants better and stronger weapons this isnt a race for the bettering of humanity but a arms race. Only this time its more then just a war amongst a group of countries this is a matter that will concern the world. Leave it be, its to much we are already the most intelagent beings on the planet why jepordize that out of blind stupidity. I know my opinion wont change the future but it can help recruit. the creation of the artilects is inebidible but it can be stoped!!!

The end of cosmists is my goal and i can only hope it is yours too, to leave things be. As they are is as they should stay. we live we die this is not the only life we will live i can promise you that. And im not trying to feed you any religous Bull Shit!!! you can feel it in your soul there are different dimensions of this universe and entitys roaming the earth as proof. Beleive what you will but in the end will come your answer.TO THE END OF COSMIST AND TO STOP THE GOAL TO CREATE A HIGHER BEING IS MY WILL!!!

]]> By: Hugh http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18576 Hugh Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:10:19 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18576 We are finally coming to understand true religion. We, as a species, are become or evolving into beings that want to be Godlike. Why wouldn't we want something to start to worship us? Whether they replace us or not. According to Dr. Hugo de Garis, the AI's we build will replace us. But being the creators, there will be a bit of worship and remeberance. What could be better....? We are finally coming to understand true religion. We, as a species, are become or evolving into beings that want to be Godlike. Why wouldn’t we want something to start to worship us? Whether they replace us or not. According to Dr. Hugo de Garis, the AI’s we build will replace us. But being the creators, there will be a bit of worship and remeberance. What could be better….?

]]> By: Doug http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18552 Doug Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:36:25 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-18552 This...has already happened...artilects...in mho This…has already happened…artilects…in mho

]]> By: Jack http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1621 Jack Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:27:11 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1621 It isn't entirely related but I was trying to explain what i though The previous poster meant about: our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans It isn’t entirely related but I was trying to explain what i though The previous poster meant about:

our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans

]]> By: Shmuel http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1584 Shmuel Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:28:49 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1584 And therefore what? How is that related to your post about an almighty machine? And therefore what?
How is that related to your post about an almighty machine?

]]> By: Jack http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1577 Jack Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:53:18 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1577 I am running this blog, and i think the point about proving we are not humans is based off; Moore's law. It would be reasonable to assume we would be able to create a accurate recreation of the world and everything on it, thus we could part of this simulation and not know. I am running this blog, and i think the point about proving we are not humans is based off; Moore’s law. It would be reasonable to assume we would be able to create a accurate recreation of the world and everything on it, thus we could part of this simulation and not know.

]]> By: Shmuel http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1561 Shmuel Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:34:21 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1561 Mark, Are you the guy running this blog? and in response to: "our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans" and how will building an AI achive that? Mark,
Are you the guy running this blog?
and in response to:
“our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans”

and how will building an AI achive that?

]]> By: Mark http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1480 Mark Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:01:24 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1480 This does assume that we are not actually quantum processing robots and our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans This does assume that we are not actually quantum processing robots and our need to build AI robots is in itself a way to prove to our collective egos that we are in fact not robots but humans

]]> By: Shmuel http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1451 Shmuel Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:24:24 +0000 http://www.jacktams.co.uk/2006/11/10/the-rise-of-the-artilects-part1/#comment-1451 Scientists, science fiction writer and whomever ponders the subject comes to the conclusion that the intellectual robots will want to over run us in order to control. Why? Why would the robots care? Why would they care if x or y is happening to them? They are taught to learn and understand unlike humans and other existing creatures who’s most powerful impulse is to survive, and in order to survive in the best way possible they search for that that will provide them with the most power or destroy those who might object it. One can protest and say that they can be built to care, in which case one should fear now since there are already machines that can autonomously use weapons based on facial recognition. So, Why? Scientists, science fiction writer and whomever ponders the subject comes to the conclusion that the intellectual robots will want to over run us in order to control. Why? Why would the robots care?
Why would they care if x or y is happening to them?
They are taught to learn and understand unlike humans and other existing creatures who’s most powerful impulse is to survive, and in order to survive in the best way possible they search for that that will provide them with the most power or destroy those who might object it.
One can protest and say that they can be built to care, in which case one should fear now since there are already machines that can autonomously use weapons based on facial recognition.
So,
Why?

]]>