<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jacktams.co.uk &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacktams.net/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacktams.net</link>
	<description>Sweating Spinal Fluid.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boycott Apple &#8211; Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2012/01/30/boycott-apple-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2012/01/30/boycott-apple-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.net/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple, the computer giant whose sleek products have become a mainstay of modern life, is dealing with a public relations disaster and the threat of calls for a boycott of its iPhones and iPad. via Apple hit by boycott call over worker abuses in China &#124; Technology &#124; The Observer. Two Important things to note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-28" title="Apple Logo" src="http://www.jacktams.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/37093_apple-logo.gif" alt="" width="194" height="200" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Apple, the computer giant whose sleek products have become a mainstay of modern life, is dealing with a public relations disaster and the threat of calls for a boycott of its iPhones and iPad.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/29/apple-faces-boycott-worker-abuses">Apple hit by boycott call over worker abuses in China | Technology | The Observer</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Two Important things to note about this 'bogus-ness':</strong></p>
<p><strong>A)</strong> Foxconn make lots and lots of consumer electronics for practically every company on this earth. Xbox or PS3 yup that's them.</p>
<p><strong>B)</strong> Apple, has been extraordinarily transparent about its manufacturing record. But, rules and expectations do not translate from one country to another.</p>
<blockquote><p>"If you add up all the workers who have died to build your iPhone or iPad, the number is shockingly high,"  - Peter Cohan : Forbes</p></blockquote>
<p>Finally, if your going to write sound-bites, at least have the decency to give the number or cite the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2012/01/30/boycott-apple-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bad Week For The Cloud.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/03/01/a-bad-week-for-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/03/01/a-bad-week-for-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gfail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediatemple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world is abuzz with talk of the next big thing in computing, the cloud. Well this week my experiences have told me one thing, the cloud sucks, it is the biggest pile of BS since the bailout of the banks. First, Google Mail (gmail for the US) failed. Leaving customers both on hosted and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-502" title="gfail" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/gfail.jpg" alt="gfail" width="520" height="100" /></p>
<p>The world is abuzz with talk of the next big thing in computing, the cloud. Well this week my experiences have told me one thing, the cloud sucks, it is the biggest pile of BS since the bailout of the banks.</p>
<p>First, Google Mail (gmail for the US) failed. Leaving customers both on hosted and the standard accounts, then my favourite hosting provider of nearly 5 years fails on me, there (gs) or GridService. The cloud based shared hosting system, which I decided to put some of my clients on to allow rapid scaling or as it has turned out rapid failing.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-499" title="fail" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fail.jpg" alt="fail" width="520" height="50" /></p>
<p>The storage cluster of which my server is a part has failed, in a whale like fashion - Spewing its entrails all over the server. Thankfully my managerie of dedicated servers are still up and running, but I hadn't transferred the remainder of the sites out of the (gs). Meaning the biggest of all my sites is no down for the count, and has been down for over 24hrs.</p>
<p>I love (mt) mediatemple, and there support staff are not doubt taking flak from every corner. But, I would really appreciate it if I could edit my DNS entries so I can get something up to explain to customers what the hell is going on, and no we haven't gone bankrupt.</p>
<p>I would like to add, that I still would recommend mediatemple to anyone, but just not the (gs). If you want cloud <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/">Amazon EC2</a> or <a href="http://mediatemple.net/labs/cs/">mediatemple (cs)</a> when its out is what you want.</p>
<p><a href="http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2009/03/01/cluster-2-important-update/">MediaTemple Cluster2 Status</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/24/trouble-in-the-clouds-gmail-turns-into-gfail/">TechCruch GFail</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/03/01/a-bad-week-for-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>last.fm vs TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/lastfm-vs-techcrunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/lastfm-vs-techcrunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being the heavy user of Last.fm I was a little concerned when techcrunch broke the story that supposably, last.fm had given the RIAA, information pertaining to users who had scrobbled any tracks from the Upcoming and undrealeased U2 album. The fact I can't stand the rose tinted glasses wearing, Irish Hypocrite is beside the point. Firstly, what got me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the heavy user of Last.fm I was a little concerned when techcrunch broke the story that supposably, last.fm had given the RIAA, information pertaining to users who had scrobbled any tracks from the Upcoming and undrealeased U2 album. The fact I can't stand the rose tinted glasses wearing, Irish Hypocrite is beside the point.</p>
<p>Firstly, what got me there was no mention of the Data Protection act fair enough last.fm is a CBS company, but its still based in the UK (for the most part) and that would mean the passing of this data would be illegal. You cannot pass data to a third party without consent from the data subject.</p>
<p>Also it seems like there are alot of people and blogs posting unsubstantiated rumours to get traffic and therefore ad revenue etc. I know its always been there but it seems like everybody is at it even big news companies, what little credibilty these sites have is been quickly ruined by hastly researched stories and a all too trigger happy publish finger. </p>
<p>Last.fm - Keep up the good work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/20/did-lastfm-just-hand-over-user-listening-data-to-the-riaa/" target="_blank">TechCrunch Article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.last.fm/2009/02/23/techcrunch-are-full-of-shit" target="_blank">Last.fm - "TechCrunch is full of shit"</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/lastfm-vs-techcrunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week I was on the internet and found this&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/this-week-i-was-on-the-internet-and-found-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/this-week-i-was-on-the-internet-and-found-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noteworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Enriquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Talk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="446" height="326" data="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/JuanEnriquez_2009-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/JuanEnriquez-2009.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=463" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/23/this-week-i-was-on-the-internet-and-found-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psystar Continues to be a thorn in Apples Side</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/09/psystar-continues-to-be-a-thorn-in-apples-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/09/psystar-continues-to-be-a-thorn-in-apples-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psystar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interesting twist, Computer World is reporting that a federal judge ruled last week that the Mac clone maker Psystar can continue its countersuit against computer maker and Mac OS developer Apple Corporation. Neowin So what is Apple's next move, well thats quite simple. If you can't beat them fairly beat them unfairly. I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In an interesting twist, Computer World is reporting that a federal judge ruled last week that the Mac clone maker Psystar can continue its countersuit against computer maker and Mac OS developer Apple Corporation. <cite><a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/02/09/psystar-wins-legal-round-against-apple">Neowin</a></cite></p></blockquote>
<p>So what is Apple's next move, well thats quite simple. If you can't beat them fairly beat them unfairly. I can see Apple taking some of that <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2007/tc20070301_402290.htm">Cash on Hand</a>, and buying Psystar outright and effectively putting them out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/09/psystar-continues-to-be-a-thorn-in-apples-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Bans Facebook &#8211; Not So Sure.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/06/apple-bans-facebook-not-so-sure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/06/apple-bans-facebook-not-so-sure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple-Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well at least some stores are banning the popular social networking sites from the instore computers. While alot can be said including that its an evil move by a big corporation. Although it is since been found out that Apple is not doing this by a policy and it appears only a handful of stores [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least some stores are banning the popular social networking sites from the instore computers. While alot can be said including that its an evil move by a big corporation. Although it is since been found out that Apple is not doing this by a policy and it appears only a handful of stores are operating the policy.</p>
<p>I personally think that Apple will enact such a policy across all stores soon, they want to stay profitable after all and time is money. The time spent dealing with questions and people who a clearly not there to buy only to check their gmail account has to stop. Apple has a massive retail presence based on quality of staff, if they are to keep the quality of staff high and thus maintain this appearance through the oncoming storm, they have to draw the line at some point.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://tinycomb.com/2009/02/05/apple-store-bans-facebook-for-life/" target="_blank">TinyComb</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/06/are-apple-stores-battling-internet-cafe-vibe-by-banning-facebook/">TechCrunch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2009/02/06/apple-bans-facebook-not-so-sure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hello Dave, You Look Nice Today&#8221; &#8211; One step closer to HAL 9000</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/12/hello-dave-you-look-nice-today-one-step-closer-to-hal-9000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/12/hello-dave-you-look-nice-today-one-step-closer-to-hal-9000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Turing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hal 9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turing Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the machines became a little smarter, as a computer named Elbot managed to achieve a 25% success rate when convincing a human being that they were talking to another human. via Gizmodo &#38; The Telegraph  Should the law of exponential growth hold, it isn't going to long until we can create programs that can ace the turing test. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/hal.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-422" title="hal" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/hal-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="180" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Today, the machines became a little smarter, as a computer named Elbot managed to achieve a 25% success rate when convincing a human being that they were talking to another human. <cite>via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062385/computer-nearly-passes-turing-test-for-artificial-intelligence">Gizmodo</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/10/12/eacomputer112.xml">The Telegraph</a></cite> </p></blockquote>
<p>Should the law of exponential growth hold, it isn't going to long until we can create programs that can ace the turing test. Its taken 58 years <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test">[1]</a> from its inception to this point, I don't think it will take us many more years before the test is passed.</p>
<p>Ray Kurzweil has previously stated in his books (Age of Spiritual Machines &amp; The Singularity is Near) that we would be able to create a system that accurately simulates human interaction to pass the turing test <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test#Predictions_and_tests">[2]</a> I think I am going to go out on a limb and say it will be much sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/12/hello-dave-you-look-nice-today-one-step-closer-to-hal-9000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem with Open &#8211; Android vs iPhone.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/05/the-problem-with-open-android-vs-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/05/the-problem-with-open-android-vs-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pull my finger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been lots of talk about Apple is doomed to fail with the iPhone as a software Platform and the Android platform is going to be so much better, simple because its open. Firstly, take a look at the iPhone. Its a fantastically designed device, and the attention to detail is insane - that's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been lots of talk about Apple is doomed to fail with the iPhone as a software Platform and the Android platform is going to be so much better, simple because its open.</p>
<p>Firstly, take a look at the iPhone. Its a fantastically designed device, and the attention to detail is insane - that's not to say the Android platform isn't. But it is a sensible justification that the platform needs to slightly closed to allow a continuity of quality to be maintained. Secondly, the iTunes to iPhone facility has yet to face any real competition, its far from perfect but there is a seamless connection from buying to using. You click buy and the app or music is downloaded and synced to your phone, without having to drag and drop, move or do anything manually. However there is growing concern that the closed nature of the platform will be its undoing see Pull My Finger <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/09/rejected-pull-m.html" target="_blank">[1]</a><span id="more-413"></span></p>
<p>Lets be fair, the Android platform does has some major advantages. Anything, anyone and everything can be developed for it, its open. The Android developers needn't be the best usability experts, they just wait for the experts to develop there own slick UI for the system - but here in lies a pitfall, how open is open. For instance T-Mobile have already said that the G1 shouldn't be used as at tethered device <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/t-mobiles-cto-on-g1-unlocking-and-tethering-plus-a-few-detai/" target="_blank">[2]</a>, and there are also limits to how much you can actually do, before it starts to impact on stability of the system, something vitally important if it is to <em>really </em>go head to head with the iPhone.</p>
<p>I am all for the open platform, but the average Joe consumer it makes no difference, really super cool device (iPhone) or clunky lucking no the less cool device (T-Mobile G1) </p>
<p><strong>So open shouldn't really be open?</strong></p>
<p>I think the main problem with an open platform is you end up with far too much choice, which is fine for a geek. The average consumer wants simple, so I would hope that there are some very clear limits placed on developing for the Android, i.e. you can use this much and no more, you can't access the ... etc this means that stability can be maintained. </p>
<p>Its the problem Microsoft has always had, you can't be all things to all people and you can't ensure everything works all of the time, which in-part open source solves the problem. But also pretty soon you can end up with the same phone running radically different programs and processes. Whilst some people may favor this model, it isn't good business. Especially when going after the Goliath that the iPhone has become.</p>
<p>The Android Platform and the G1 have promise but I don't think this iteration of the idea will make much of a dent on the iPhone at least not with the core consumer, but I can see the early adopters of the world moving of to Android.</p>
<p>As a developer I would develop for both, as I consumer I would have the iPhone, as a Geek I would have the Android. So I will end up with both in my pocket.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://twit.tv/162" target="_blank">Written whilst listening to TWiT 162</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/10/05/the-problem-with-open-android-vs-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$75,000 &#8211; Another Epic Waste of Money.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/26/75000-another-epic-waste-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/26/75000-another-epic-waste-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copysense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packet sniffing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snooping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever happened to commonsense and peoples BS meters. The CopySense Appliance is the only solution that can identify and block illegal sharing of copyrighted files while allowing other legitimate P2P uses to continue.Audible Magic via TorrentFreak So what does the $75,000 network appliance get you, well nothing other than another piece of useless technology attached [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to commonsense and peoples BS meters.</p>
<blockquote><p>The CopySense Appliance is the only solution that can identify and block illegal sharing of copyrighted files while allowing other legitimate P2P uses to continue.<cite><a href="http://www.audiblemagic.com/products-services/copysense/">Audible Magic</a> via <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/copysense-sleek-predator-or-white-elephant-080926/">TorrentFreak</a></cite></p></blockquote>
<p>So what does the $75,000 network appliance get you, well nothing other than another piece of useless technology attached to your network. But, it does mean you can when sued go "Look mister we have a CopySense Appliance, that couldn't have possibly been us" Net result the lawsuit goes away.</p>
<p>Is it worth that much? Short answer is no. Commonsense has shown that the RIAA and MPAA are still stuggling with the modern world and have yet to make any allegations really stick with any great amount of evidence and justification, other than they need a new revenue stream because their main streams of cash, are rapidly drying up because no body is going pay the exorbitant fees they want.</p>
<p>Still I wouldn't mind being the company that is selling this stuff to what seems like market that just keeps righting blank cheques to the companies who say they can solve their every problem. Another Epic Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/26/75000-another-epic-waste-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITV: Your Problems Michael Grade</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/17/itv-your-problems-michael-grade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/17/itv-your-problems-michael-grade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celeb air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hi def]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael grade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Google and YouTube are parasites. It's all about content; the rest is just railway lines." You utter clot, YouTube living off the great content that ITV are making - CelebAir another brilliant way to spend ITVs budget. I am sorry but you have complete lost touch with reality and ITV deserves to loose its place [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/grade-michael-040327.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-401" title="grade-michael-040327" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/grade-michael-040327-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>"Google and YouTube are parasites. It's all about content; the rest is just railway lines."</p></blockquote>
<p>You utter clot, YouTube living off the great content that ITV are making - CelebAir another brilliant way to spend ITVs budget. I am sorry but you have complete lost touch with reality and ITV deserves to loose its place on the FTSE100, business man exploits whatever tool available to them when in a corner, ITV resorts to cheap shots.<br />
<span id="more-400"></span><br />
Look at the BBC, they are publishing left, right and center to youtube and iPlayer has left the other UK broadcasters in the dust. Lets not forget the technology he is attacking is directly powering all of ITVs Digital and Hi-Def content (H.264 encoding and MPEG). Looking at it that way isn't the broadcaster the parasite, living off a much larger ecosystem of digital content providers. I finish with another titbit from the same article:</p>
<blockquote><p>"People who keep writing the obituaries for existing broadcasters ignore one thing - they are people who are in love with technology and distribution mechanisms - that the history of the modern media age is littered with casualties of people who believed in technology rather than content."</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that is an obituary enough, lets not embrace change. Lets watch as we leave the FTSE100 never to return again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/09/17/itv-your-problems-michael-grade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viacom = Big Evil, Judge = Insane</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/07/04/viacom-big-evil-judge-insane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/07/04/viacom-big-evil-judge-insane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough Viacom is going after money from its interlectual property or however they want to justify it but in the long run they have damaged themselves beyond repair.  Firstly, they image wasn't all that great, and they completely miss the point of the internet. For example, by allowing clips to be uploaded of 'their' [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough Viacom is going after money from its interlectual property or however they want to justify it but in the long run they have damaged themselves beyond repair. </p>
<p>Firstly, they image wasn't all that great, and they completely miss the point of the internet. For example, by allowing clips to be uploaded of 'their' material they generate more hype and buzz and most importantly more viewers, yet again late to the party reaction. Insert foot into mouth and take the people to court.</p>
<p>Secondly, they have forced Google's hand, by releasing the data on what IPs and therefore people have viewed on Youtube to Viacom, this is <strong>illegal</strong> at least in the UK, under the data protection act. It sets a very scary president one that brings us very close to the Orwelian 1984 set up. I wish somebody takes this up and fights back, the days when the big companies could dictate what happens in the world should be over, seemingly not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/07/04/viacom-big-evil-judge-insane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBay Selling Fakes &#8211; No it couldn&#8217;t possibly be&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/30/ebay-selling-fakes-no-it-couldnt-possibly-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/30/ebay-selling-fakes-no-it-couldnt-possibly-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis vuitton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury fakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The online auction site has been ordered to pay compensation by a judge in Paris for allowing users to trade counterfeit items Via Times Online Louis Vuitton sues eBay, for selling 'luxury' fakes. First question what took so long, and what makes them think they have any possibility of winning or even settling the lawsuit. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The online auction site has been ordered to pay compensation by a judge in Paris for allowing users to trade counterfeit items</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/corporate_law/article4241267.ece" target="_blank">Via Times Online</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Louis Vuitton sues eBay, for selling 'luxury' fakes. First question what took so long, and what makes them think they have any possibility of winning or even settling the lawsuit.</p>
<p>I think its laughable that companies still think they can get away with such stupid lawsuits, the bottom line is the profits can't be all that good, on their end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/30/ebay-selling-fakes-no-it-couldnt-possibly-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How not to survive the onslaught of WWDC.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/how-not-to-survive-the-onslaught-of-wwdc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/how-not-to-survive-the-onslaught-of-wwdc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has come under attack for being a great service that has a poor record of up time Link1 - TechCrunch, Link 2 - TechCrunch. Well news on the street is Twitter survived the several thousand posts it recieved during WWDC, including my own meager posts. But at what cost. I laughingly joked that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/6a00d8341d742c53ef00e54fa603818833-800wi.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-318" title="Twitter Logo" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/6a00d8341d742c53ef00e54fa603818833-800wi-300x110.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="110" /></a></span>Twitter has come under attack for being a great service that has a poor record of up time <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/09/use-twiddict-for-those-inevitable-twitter-downtimes/" target="_blank">Link1 - TechCrunch</a>,<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/08/twitter-tempts-fate/" target="_blank"> Link 2 - TechCrunch</a>. Well news on the street is Twitter survived the several thousand posts it recieved during WWDC, including my own meager posts. But at what cost.</p>
<p>I laughingly joked that the next feature for twitter to disable to ensure it stayed up, was to turn off twittering. In reality it was nearly at that point the following features were cut for the duration of the Keynote:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>@ Replies</li>
<li>Everyone Tab</li>
<li>Archive Tab</li>
<li>Public Timeline</li>
<li>Limit number of API requests from 30 Request Per Hour to 10</li>
<li>Updates by SMS</li>
<li>User Deletion and Restoration </li>
</ul>
<div>It seems to me that the vast majority of the functionality of twitter was culled to ensure uptime, the community was just lobotomised with no thought. I applaud twitter for staying online, but it shouldn't have cost the features that make Twitter, Twitter and not just some meta-blogging platform.</div>
<div>Twitter has got plenty of issues with scaling, if anything WWDC has proved that twitter cannot scale with demand. To use a analogy, a TV station does not cut the commentary of a football match because the system cannot cope with the demand, this is essentially what Twitter did to the community.</div>
<blockquote>
<div>It looks like we were spot-on with our estimate of ten times the normal traffic today. Our preparations held and Twitter stayed up! Only one unexpected disruption occured and that was a network problem in our data center which caused a few minutes of service distruption some time after Steve Jobs' keynote. With that single distruption, our uptime during the event was 97.3%</div>
<div><a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2008/06/we-made-it.html" target="_blank">From Twitter Blog</a> &amp; <a href="http://status.twitter.com/" target="_blank">Twitter Status</a></div>
</blockquote>
<div>I love Twitter, and despite the fact I don't really get it yet. I don't want to see it disappear because it couldn't handle its popularity.</div>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/how-not-to-survive-the-onslaught-of-wwdc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WWDC Roundup &#8211; iPhone 3G &amp; Mobile Me</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/wwdc-roundup-iphone-3g-mobile-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/wwdc-roundup-iphone-3g-mobile-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keynot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WWDC was a bit of a let down, iphone alleys' coverage by ustream however was fantastic. I was expecting more information and more products, not a grueling 45mins of demo's of apps we cant use for a month, not quite the usual Apple finesse we have come to appreciate. One important thing to note was Steve Job's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hero20080609.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-360 alignleft" style="float: left;" title="Apple iPhone 3G" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hero20080609-300x287.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="287" /></a>WWDC was a bit of a let down, <a href="http://www.iphonealley.com/news/apple-announces-the-iphone-3g-has-3g-amp-gps?s=543029d4105c0679d98e91fc542a648a" target="_blank">iphone alleys'</a> coverage by ustream however was fantastic. I was expecting more information and more products, not a grueling 45mins of demo's of apps we cant use for a month, not quite the usual Apple finesse we have come to appreciate.</p>
<p>One important thing to note was Steve Job's committed to pricing the new 8gb iPhone at no more that $199US in all 70 countries the iPhone 3g will be sold in by the end of the year. I hope this is the signal of a much bigger push by Apple to price equivalently in all countries. That said they create products people will gladly pay for in some cases even twice such as myself who will be upgrading come July 11th once again.</p>
<p>Surprisingly the announcement of OS X 10.6 dubbed Snow Leopard was pushed from the forefront of the announcement, giving credence to the fact it will not be a stability release just a fit and polish release to keep ahead of the competition. Also .mac will be no longer and be replaced by mobile me, which has to be an improvement of the aging .mac name and technology.</p>
<p>It was a bit of a let down in the fact that Steve had very little stage time, some <a href="http://twitter.com/mollywood/statuses/830629917" target="_blank">reported</a> as usually steve looked ill.</p>
<p>Shock Horror - There was no one more thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/09/wwdc-roundup-iphone-3g-mobile-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once your lucky, Twice your stupid.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/05/once-your-lucky-twice-your-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/05/once-your-lucky-twice-your-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPlayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BBC1 will be web-streamed live through BBC.co.uk as of next year, according to the broadcaster’s director general Mark Thompson. BBC1 is internet bound Hoping to capitalise on its impressive iPlayer service the Beeb has decided why not go back to the 90's and try something they know doesn't work. People simply do not want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BBC1 will be web-streamed live through BBC.co.uk as of next year, according to the broadcaster’s director general Mark Thompson.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/bbc1-is-internet-bound-382709" target="_blank">BBC1 is internet bound</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hoping to capitalise on its impressive iPlayer service the Beeb has decided why not go back to the 90's and try something they know doesn't work.</p>
<p>People simply do not want to watch TV in a linear sense anymore, the only content thats worth streaming are sports events, I there isn't much chance of that happening soon.</p>
<p>The BBC needs to work on iPlayer and getting the BBC online identity sorted out, its abit of a mish mash at the moment. With iPlayer the BBC struck gold and unless they keep pushing they will become a follower not a leader. I think the best idea would be to can live streaming, and just make iPlayer better they would be forgiven for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/05/once-your-lucky-twice-your-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple No Go @ Expos</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/apple-no-go-expos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/apple-no-go-expos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macworld is reporting that Apple will not attend the Apple Expo in France this year.  Apple: We are attending fewer trade shows each year My question is, does anybody really think Apple need to attend every expo. They generate more than enough publicity for any company without saying anything. Unconfirmed List for next week WWDC iPhone 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Macworld is <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/133767/2008/06/appleexpo.html" target="_blank">reporting</a> that Apple will not attend the Apple Expo in France this year. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/04/apple-we-are-attending-fewer-trade-shows-each-year/" target="_blank">Apple: We are attending fewer trade shows each year</a></p></blockquote>
<p>My question is, does anybody really think Apple need to attend every expo. They generate more than enough publicity for any company without saying anything.</p>
<p>Unconfirmed List for next week WWDC</p>
<ul>
<li>iPhone 2 &amp; All the trimmings</li>
<li>New macs of any description</li>
<li>Mac OS X 10.6 - Snow Leopard</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/apple-no-go-expos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes Movies &#8211; An Inconvenient Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/itunes-movies-an-inconvenient-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/itunes-movies-an-inconvenient-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[An Inconvenient Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes UK Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie rentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was less then 30 minutes after the official word that iTunes was selling films in the UK store, before I was watching Batman Begins. But is the convenience coming at too high a cost? In the UK we have become used getting ripped off around every corner, it stinks but we are British so we put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/itunesmovies.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-353" title="iTunes Movies" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/itunesmovies.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="162" /></a><br />
It was less then 30 minutes after the official word that iTunes was selling films in the UK store, before I was watching Batman Begins. But is the convenience coming at too high a cost?</p>
<p>In the UK we have become used getting ripped off around every corner, it stinks but we are British so we put up with it. My problem is that some of the films now available particularly Al Gores documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" <strong>£10.99</strong> At this point the noveltywore off, I can have this shipped to me from amazon £6.22 in less than two days.</p>
<p>I aren't apposed to paying £6.99 for a film, but £10.99 for a film that you can buy in the shops for less than £7 I think its pushing it. Us Brits whilst being hard done by after getting the long of the stick for so many years we have all become cynics, and easily see where profiteering is taking place. We saw it with the iPhone, which didn't do anywhere near as well as planned (<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/19/iphone-uk-sales-disappoint" target="_blank">see here</a>) We also see it with practically every computer or gadget, when you get nearly 2$US to £1GBP and the prices of things are the same in dollars as pounds you know there is something wrong.</p>
<p>Unless iTunes get more content up in the store and stop stupid pricing, they may just take off. Who am I kidding it will take off whatever apple do, its what their good at. I would like to think that Apple at least get some semblance of order in pricing and price match with the High Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/06/04/itunes-movies-an-inconvenient-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I became Inspector Gadget.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/28/how-i-became-inspector-gadget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/28/how-i-became-inspector-gadget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby_on_rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 3.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 98]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows_machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are certain points in your life where you can't help but look back on the preceding years. Officially I have now left college on study leave, until 20 June, which is my last day ever. So how the hell did I end up at this point. My first exposure to a computer was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There are certain points in your life where you can't help but look back on the preceding years. Officially I have now left college on study leave, until 20 June, which is my last day ever. So how the hell did I end up at this point.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-341" title="Windows 3.1" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/win31-1-1-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>My first exposure to a computer was a windows 3.1 machine in 1995, it was god awful but I was only five and young kids and technology don't really get on. It was a good few years before I got a computer of my own, I ended up with a Pentium 1 MX running Windows 95, which didn't last long. I couldn't play any games on it, and it was stable as a long pole with a plate on it. So inevetably it was upgraded to a machine running Windows 98 Pentium 2, with a decent graphics card and MPEG decoder card.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ee; text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/win98-logo.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-342" title="Windows 98" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/win98-logo-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></span>Its probably at that point that the bug really caught me, from then on in I had a slew of applications and experiments going on the poor computer, which I still have under my desk. Three computers later and I made the big switch to Mac, something which I haven't regretted, and still manage to keep up with windows excluding Vista which is almost as bad as 3.1. I also managed to pick up Ruby on Rails and a bit of PHP along the way, and ashamed as I am to say it Visual Basic.</p>
<p>People always ask me how I know how computers work. The simple answer is I have been tinkering with them for far too long. Every computer I have owned has been broken replaced upgraded and attacked by me, leading me to come across practically every common error you can get. Its sad to say but I can usually diagnose a hardware fault before the BIOS has finished its self test at boot up, and a software problem by hitting less then 10 commands.</p>
<p>The trend over the last few years is people are using technology every waking moment, but very few know how the stuff works. I love knowing how it works, and couldn't really care less about using it. I will strip things down take them to bits, rebuild them, and then maybe use them. Because of this I have a collection of gadgets and gizmos that few other people my age can boast. It also means, that college work can sometimes come a distant second to a new gadget or blog post.</p>
<p>I don't procrastinate as such, I just love technology to distraction. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Wait a minute that is technically procrastinating.</span> I don't know what career I may choose, convergent technologies mean that practically any field is open to me.</p>
<p>Best bit is I know there will never be a boring job, technology is getting more and more exciting the closer we get to the point on the curve we drop off.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/28/how-i-became-inspector-gadget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with IT &#8211; More money Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/the-problem-with-it-more-money-syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/the-problem-with-it-more-money-syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noteworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more money syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more and more I deal with companies and managing networks and working with the wonderful world of windows server, the more and more I realise how poor many companies deal with IT. Q: "What is the problem?" A: "I don't really know, but we can solve it if we buy a new X " [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/frizz3.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-320 alignright" style="float: right;" title="Computer Frustration" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/frizz3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The more and more I deal with companies and managing networks and working with the wonderful world of windows server, the more and more I realise how poor many companies deal with IT.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Q:</strong> "What is the problem?"<br />
<strong>A:</strong> "I don't really know, but we can solve it if we buy a new X "</p></blockquote>
<p>Here in lies the problem, there a number of companies that get this crap answer. There is very rarely a person in the company who will take responsibility and make sure their current system works properly before trying new things or upgrading, at the end of the day new hardware is meant to be better right?. Small to medium businesses have less of a problem with this because the amount spent on IT directly effects there bottom line, and don't have deep pockets for IT to begin with.</p>
<p>The problem becomes even more pronounced when you get to a school or college. There are obvious complexities with these system your dealing with a couple of hundred computers and about 10 times as many users, but when anything goes wrong more money 'must' be spent to solve the problem. Inevitably the systems breakdown within a couple of weeks or even days, because the real problem wasn't tackled or even attempted to find a fix.</p>
<p>For the average user this is a minor or major frustration depending on which way you spin it, but for anybody interested or working in tech like me, its like having burnt sticks buried into the back of my eyes. It can't be too difficult to get it set up right in the first place, I like buying new tech as much as the next man (probably even more) but you have to realise somewhere along the line what you are proposing is costing someone a shed load of money and that money could be used better elsewhere, especially in schools.</p>
<p><em>--Rant Over--</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/the-problem-with-it-more-money-syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I almost get Twitter, I think.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/i-almost-get-twitter-i-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/i-almost-get-twitter-i-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[understanding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacktams.co.uk/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so I will be the first to admit I am quite the geek but I didn't really get twitter. Fair enough I have had an account but it wasn't until last night that the penny finally dropped. So I have twitter in my AIM account, but have never really done anything with it. "track [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-318" title="Twitter Logo" src="http://www.jacktams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/6a00d8341d742c53ef00e54fa603818833-800wi-300x110.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="110" />OK, so I will be the first to admit I am quite the geek but I didn't really get twitter. Fair enough I have had an account but it wasn't until last night that the penny finally dropped.</p>
<p>So I have twitter in my AIM account, but have never really done anything with it. "track iron man" the 3 words that brought about the revelation that made twitter make sense to me.</p>
<p>Within seconds I had 30 messages, all relating to our favorite subject Iron Man. Not content with just one subject I added a couple more, and then shut down AIM. Unfortunately for my iphone it was ill equipped to deal with that many messages in one go, so mobile messaging is now disabled. I think twitter is one of those weird things you come across that you have to have being using it for a couple of weeks, before you actually get it. </p>
<p>Heres to Twitter!!</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong><br />
Its one of those things that snowballs, I don't think I post that much but the information I get out of twitter is invaluable. Like:</p>
<blockquote><p>Stay until the end of Iron Man, there's an extra scene.</p></blockquote>
<p>Also its nice to just be able to post, that witty one liner you just came up with <img src='http://www.jacktams.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacktams.net/2008/05/06/i-almost-get-twitter-i-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

